In the future world, all crime investigations are determined by intelligent systems, rendering traditional criminal investigation methods obsolete. However, in this particular case, a detective is identified as the criminal. Is it truly the case, or is it a flaw in the intelligent system? When techn
In the future world, all crime investigations are determined by intelligent systems, rendering traditional criminal investigation methods obsolete. However, in this particular case, a detective is identified as the criminal. Is it truly the case, or is it a flaw in the intelligent system? When technology completely dominates human thought, can we still be referred to as "human"?
Details